Omega Protein Corporation
OMEGA PROTEIN CORP (Form: 10-Q, Received: 08/03/2011 16:48:41)
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

[Y]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

OR

 

[    ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From              to              .

Commission file number: 001-14003

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

State of Nevada   76-0562134

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

2105 City West Blvd., Suite 500  
Houston, Texas   77042-2838
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 623-0060

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X   No      .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes        No      .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer ¨

   Accelerated filer x    Non-accelerated filer ¨    Small reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

Yes        No X .

Number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, on August 1, 2011: 19,375,351.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1.   Financial Statements and Notes

  
  

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

     3   
  

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

     4   
  

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

     5   
  

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

     6   

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     21   

Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     32   

Item 4.   Controls and Procedures

     32   

PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION

  

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings

     33   

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

     33   

Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     34   

Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities

     34   

Item 4.   Removed and Reserved

     34   

Item 5.   Other Information

     34   

Item 6.   Exhibits

     35   

Signatures

     36   

 

2


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(Dollars in thousands)

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements and Notes

 

     June 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 
ASSETS      

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 47,330           $ 19,784       

Receivables, net

     23,070             11,492       

Inventories

     81,770             74,692       

Deferred tax asset, net

     —               1,673       

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     6,322             3,641       
                 

Total current assets

     158,492             111,282       

Other assets, net

     8,272             3,051       

Energy swap asset, net of current portion

     221             23       

Property, plant and equipment, net

     111,204             111,726       

Goodwill and other intangible assets, net

     10,598             10,702       
                 

Total assets

   $ 288,787           $ 236,784       
                 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

     

Current liabilities:

     

Current maturities of long-term debt

   $ 2,997           $ 2,994       

Current portion of capital lease obligation

     476             439       

Accounts payable

     2,374             2,776       

Accrued liabilities

     33,290             21,360       

Deferred tax liabilities, net

     2,390             —         
                 

Total current liabilities

     41,527             27,569       

Long-term debt, net of current maturities

     28,823             30,307       

Capital lease obligation, net of current portion

     542             820       

Interest rate swap liability, net of current portion

     —               98       

Deferred tax liability, net

     16,510             12,209       

Pension liabilities, net

     7,512             8,254       
                 

Total liabilities

     94,914             79,257       
                 

Commitments and contingencies

     

Stockholders’ equity:

     

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 authorized shares; none issued

     —               —         

Common Stock, $0.01 par value; 80,000,000 authorized shares; 19,359,653 and 18,827,278 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively

     194             188       

Capital in excess of par value

     123,193             116,950       

Retained earnings

     76,931             48,072       

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (6,445)            (7,683)      
                 

Total stockholders’ equity

     193,873             157,527       
                 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $       288,787           $ 236,784       
                 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  

Revenues

   $ 44,230           $ 36,285           $ 100,632           $ 68,557       

Cost of sales

     29,487             27,417             70,196             53,719       
                                   

Gross profit

     14,743             8,868             30,436             14,838       

Selling, general, and administrative expense

     4,767             3,955             9,618             7,222       

Research and development expense

     499             499             984             934       

(Proceeds/gains) losses resulting from Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster

     (26,177)            587             (26,177)            587       

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net – 2008 storms

     —               (117)            —               (234)      

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net – 2005 storms

     (787)            —               (787)            —         

Loss on disposal of assets

     468             152             450             268       
                                   

Operating income

     35,973             3,792             46,348             6,061       

Interest income

     10             4             28             6       

Interest expense

     (528)            (612)            (1,142)            (1,258)      

Other expense, net

     (54)            (89)            (114)            (178)      
                                   

Income before income taxes

     35,401             3,095             45,120             4,631       

Provision for income taxes

     12,496             1,112             16,261             1,669       
                                   

Net income

     22,905             1,983             28,859             2,962       

Other comprehensive income (loss):

           

Energy swap adjustment, net of tax (benefit) expense of ($482), ($165), $469 and ($333), respectively

     (998)            (319)            849             (646)      

Pension benefits adjustment, net of tax (benefit) expense of ($82), $98, $18 and $195, respectively

     195             190             389             379       
                                   

Comprehensive income

   $ 22,102           $ 1,854           $ 30,097           $ 2,695       
                                   

Basic earnings per share

   $ 1.18           $ 0.11           $ 1.51           $ 0.16       
                                   

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     19,343             18,818             19,112             18,779       
                                   

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 1.14           $ 0.11           $ 1.45           $ 0.16       
                                   

Weighted average common shares and potential
common share equivalents outstanding

     20,141             18,877             19,866             18,816       
                                   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

     Six Months Ended
June  30,
 
     2011      2010  

Cash flows from operating activities:

     

Net income

   $ 28,859           $ 2,962       

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

     

Depreciation and amortization

     8,007             7,178       

(Proceeds/gains) losses resulting from Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster

     —               587       

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net – 2008 storms

     —               (234)      

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net – 2005 storms

     (787)            —         

Loss on disposal of assets

     450             268       

Provisions for losses on receivables

     24             25       

Share based compensation

     1,483             765       

Deferred income taxes

     7,895             1,603       

Changes in assets and liabilities:

     

Receivables

     (9,065)            (687)      

Inventories

     (7,078)            (8,755)      

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     (1,561)            (1,633)      

Other assets

     (5,954)            (1,016)      

Accounts payable

     (402)            865       

Accrued liabilities

     13,918             3,758       

Pension liability, net

     (353)            (638)      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     35,436             5,048      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

     

Proceeds from insurance companies and grants, hurricanes

     —               117       

Proceeds from disposition of assets

     298             34       

Acquisition of Cyvex, net of cash acquired

     (2,086)            —         

Capital expenditures

     (9,146)            (7,570)      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     (10,934)            (7,419)      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

     

Principal payments of long-term debt

     (1,481)            (1,455)      

Principal payments of capital lease obligation

     (241)            (171)      

Proceeds from long term debt

     —               10,000       

Proceeds from stock options exercised

     2,858             307       

Excess tax benefit of stock options exercised

     1,908             59       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

     3,044             8,740       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

     27,546             6,369       

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

     19,784             2,177       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $       47,330           $       8,546       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1.     SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

            SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Business Description

Omega Protein Corporation (the “Company”) operates through three primary subsidiaries: Omega Protein, Inc., Omega Shipyard, Inc. and Cyvex Nutrition, Inc. Omega Protein, Inc. (“Omega Protein”), which is the Company’s principal operating subsidiary, operates in the menhaden processing business and is the successor to a business conducted since 1913. Omega Shipyard, Inc. (“Omega Shipyard”) owns and operates a drydock facility in Moss Point, Mississippi. Cyvex Nutrition, Inc. (“Cyvex”), founded in 1984 and acquired by the Company on December 16, 2010, is located in Irvine, California and participates in the nutraceutical industry as an ingredient provider. The Company also has a number of other immaterial direct and indirect subsidiaries.

Omega Protein is a nutritional ingredient company that is also the nation’s largest producer of omega-3 fish oil and specialty fish meal products. Omega Protein produces and markets a variety of products produced from menhaden (a herring-like species of fish found in commercial quantities in the U.S. coastal waters of the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico), including regular grade and value-added specialty fish meals, crude and refined fish oils and fish solubles. Omega Protein’s fish meal products are primarily used as a protein ingredient in animal feed for swine, cattle, aquaculture and household pets. Fish oil is utilized for animal and aquaculture feeds, industrial applications, as well as for additives to human food products and dietary supplements. Omega Protein’s fish solubles are sold primarily to livestock feed manufacturers, aquaculture feed manufacturers and for use as an organic fertilizer.

Omega Shipyard’s drydock facility is used to provide shoreside maintenance for Omega Protein’s fishing fleet and, subject to outside demand and excess capacity, occasionally for third-party vessels.

Cyvex is a premium, science-based nutraceutical supplier to dietary supplement manufacturers that focus on human health and wellness.

Basis of Presentation

These interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, the instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally provided have been omitted. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The year end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In the opinion of management the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2011, and the results of its operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and its cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Omega Protein Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Financial Statement Preparation

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Company’s financial statements and the accompanying notes and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts, when available, could differ from those estimates and those differences could have a material affect on the financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Disaster

In 2010, the Company accounted for $18.7 million in payments received during September and October related to damages incurred from the Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster in its inventory and cost of sales. The payments partially reduced cost of sales by 10.2% and 11.7%, or $3.0 and $8.2 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. With the recognition of these amounts, the Company has completed recognizing the $18.7 million in payments applied to its inventory cost pool as a result of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster.

In April 2011, the Company agreed to a final settlement of all of its claims for costs and damages incurred as a result of the oil spill caused by the Deepwater Horizon explosion on April 20, 2010. As a result of the settlement, on April 18, 2011 the Company received a final payment of $26.2 million, net of fees and expenses, from the Gulf Coast Claims Facility (“GCCF”). The amount was recognized as “(Proceeds/gains) losses resulting from Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster” in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

In total, the Company received payments of $44.8 million, net of fees and expenses, from the GCCF, including emergency payments of $7.3 million and $11.4 million in September and October of 2010, respectively. As a part of the final settlement, the Company released and waived all current and future claims against BP and all other potentially responsible parties with regard to the oil spill.

For additional information, see Note 2 – Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Disaster.

Inventories

During the off-seasons, in connection with the upcoming fishing seasons, Omega Protein incurs costs (e.g., plant and vessel related labor, utilities, rent, repairs, and depreciation) that are directly related to Omega Protein’s infrastructure. These costs accumulate in inventory and are applied as elements of the cost of production of Omega Protein’s products throughout the fishing season ratably based on monthly units of production and the expected total units of production for the season.

Any costs incurred during abnormal downtime related to activity at Omega Protein’s plants are charged to expense as incurred.

Insurance

There have been no material insurance policy changes from those previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage its cash flow exposure to interest rate changes with notional amounts as indicated below that are scheduled to mature through March 2012. As originally established, the swaps effectively converted all the Company’s variable rate debt under the term loan under its bank credit facility to a fixed rate, without exchanging the notional principal amounts. Prior to September 30, 2009, these agreements were designated as a cash flow hedge and reflected at fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as a component of total liabilities, and the related gains or losses were deferred in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Interest rate swap balances at June, 30, 2011:

 

00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000

Date of Contract

  

Original

Notional

Amount

    

Notional Amounts as of

June 30, 2011

    

Contracted
Interest Rate

 

Total Liability as of

June 30, 2011

 

April 4, 2007

   $   19,950,000           $ 8,478,800       5.16%       $ 271,100   

February 7, 2008

     10,237,500         4,462,500       3.36%     89,500   

March 19, 2008

     4,436,250         1,933,800       2.96%     33,700   
     

 

 

      

 

 

 
          $ 14,875,100             $ 394,300   

Interest rate swap balances at December 31, 2010:

 

7


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

Date of Contract

  

Original
Notional
Amount

    

Notional Amounts as of

December 31, 2010

    

Contracted
Interest Rate

 

Total Liability as of

December 31, 2010

 

April 4, 2007

   $ 19,950,000       $ 10,474,000       5.16%   $ 498,300       

February 7, 2008

       10,237,500         5,512,000       3.36%     161,800       

March 19, 2008

     4,436,250         2,389,000       2.96%     60,400       
                      
      $ 18,375,000         $ 720,500       

On September 24, 2009, the Company paid $16.6 million of the borrowings outstanding under the term loan under its prior senior credit facility using the Company’s existing cash balances. Additionally, on October 21, 2009, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank N.A. which replaced its prior senior credit facility. The details are described more fully in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements of the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. As a consequence of the debt prepayment and refinancing, the Company determined that the forecasted interest payments associated with the interest rate swaps would not occur. As a result, hedge accounting relating to the interest rate swaps was discontinued and all amounts previously recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss were reclassified to earnings during 2009. The total interest expense associated with the interest rate swap transactions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $14,700, $89,500, $28,100 and $274,400, respectively. The interest rate swap agreements remained outstanding as of June 30, 2011.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has recorded a long-term liability of $0 and $98,000, respectively, net of the current portion, in accrued liabilities of $394,300 and $622,500, respectively, to recognize the fair value of interest rate derivatives.

Energy Swap Agreements

The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. During 2011, 2010 and 2009, Omega Protein entered into energy swap agreements to manage its cash flow exposure related to the volatility of natural gas, diesel and Bunker C energy prices for its fishmeal and fish oil production operations. The swaps effectively fix pricing for the quantities listed below during the consumption periods.

Energy swap balances at June 30, 2011:

 

Energy Swap

 

Consumption Period

 

Quantity

 

Price
Per
Unit

   

Energy Swap
Asset (Liability)
as of

June 30, 2011

   

Deferred Tax
Asset (Liability)
as of

June 30, 2011

 

Diesel - NYMEX Heating Oil Swaps

  July – Nov, 2011   1,905,000

Gallons

  $ 2.43      $ 1,023,400              $ (358,200)      

Natural Gas - NYMEX Natural Gas Swaps

  July – Oct, 2011   356,000

MMBTUs

  $ 4.94        (198,100)           69,300       

Bunker C – No.6 0.3% NY-Platts Swaps
and No.6 1.0% NY-Platts Swaps

  July - Nov, 2011   1,667,400

Gallons

  $ 2.00        949,300            (332,200)      

Diesel - NYMEX Heating Oil Swaps

  May - Nov, 2012   1,810,000

Gallons

  $ 2.87        236,700            (82,900)      

Natural Gas – NYMEX Natural Gas Swaps

  April - Oct, 2012   308,000

MMBTUs

  $ 4.90        (39,200)           13,700       

Bunker C – No.6 1.0% NY-Platts Swaps

  Jun – Nov, 2012   1,045,800

Gallons

  $ 2.31        107,500            (37,600)      

Natural Gas - NYMEX Natural Gas Swaps

  April – Oct, 2013   104,000

MMBTUs

  $ 5.00        4,000            (1,400)      
                     
              $2,083,600              $ (729,300)      
                     

Energy swap balances at December 31, 2010:

 

Energy Swap

  Consumption Period   Quantity   Price
Per Unit
    Energy Swap
Asset (Liability)
as of

December 31,
2010
    Deferred Tax
Asset (Liability)
as of

December 31,
2010
 

Diesel - NYMEX Heating Oil Swap

  May – Nov, 2011   1,714,000

Gallons

  $ 2.12      $ 776,200          $ (263,900)      

 

8


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

Natural Gas - NYMEX Natural Gas Swap

  April – Oct, 2011   336,000

MMBTUs

  $ 5.24        (239,800)           81,500       

Bunker C – No.6 0.3% NY-Platts Swap

  May - Nov, 2011   672,000

Gallons

  $ 1.77        206,500            (70,200)      

Diesel - NYMEX Heating Oil Swap

  May – Nov, 2012   648,000

Gallons

  $ 2.50        57,400            (19,500)      

Natural Gas - NYMEX Natural Gas Swap

  April – Oct, 2012   101,000

MMBTUs

  $ 5.30        (36,000)           12,200       

Bunker C – No.6 1.0% NY-Platts Swap

  Jun - Nov, 2012   378,000

Gallons

  $ 2.00        1,300            (400)      
                     
            $ 765,600              $ (260,300)      
                     

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Omega Protein has recorded a long-term asset of $220,700 and $22,600, respectively, net of the current portion included in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $1,862,900 and $743,000, respectively, to recognize the fair value of energy swap derivatives, and has also recorded a deferred tax liability of $729,300 and $260,300, respectively, associated therewith. The effective portion of the change in fair value from inception to June 30, 2011 is recorded in “accumulated other comprehensive income loss” in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The following table illustrates the changes recorded, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive loss resulting from the energy swap agreements (in thousands).

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  

Beginning balance

   $ 2,352           $ 442           $ 505           $ 769       

Net (gain) loss, net of tax, reclassified to
unallocated inventory cost pool

     (498)            157             (498)            157       

Net change associated with current period
swap transactions, net of tax

     (500)            (476)            1,347             (803)      
                                   

Ending balance

   $       1,354           $       123           $     1,354           $       123       
                                   

The $1.4 million reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of June 30, 2011 will be reclassified to the unallocated inventory cost pool in the period when the energy consumption takes place. The amount to be reclassified, net of taxes, during the next 12 months is expected to be approximately $1.2 million.

If, at any time, the swaps are determined to be ineffective, in whole or in part, due to changes in the Company’s energy usage or underlying hedge agreements or assumptions, the fair value of the portion of the energy swaps determined to be ineffective will be recognized as a gain or loss in cost of sales for the applicable period. See Note 17 – Fair Value Disclosures for additional information.

Accumulated Comprehensive Loss

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in stockholders’ equity are as follows:

 

       June 30,  
2011
       December 31,  
2010
 
     (in thousands)  

Fair Value of Energy Swaps, net of tax provision of $729 as of June 30, 2011 and $260 as of December 31, 2010

   $     1,354           $         505      

Pension Benefits Adjustments, net of tax benefit of $4,200 as of June 30, 2011 and $4,218 as of December 31, 2010

     (7,799)            (8,188)      
                 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

   $ (6,445)          $ (7,683)      
                 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company does not amortize goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets but performs tests for impairment annually, or when indications of potential impairment exist, utilizing a fair value approach at the reporting unit level. The Company determines fair value

 

9


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

using widely accepted valuation techniques, including the income approach which estimates the fair value of its reporting units based on the future discounted cash flows, and the market approach which estimates the fair value of its reporting units based on comparable market prices. In testing for a potential impairment of goodwill, the Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units to which goodwill relates and compares it to the carrying value (book value) of the assets and liabilities related to those businesses.

The Company amortizes other intangible assets with determinable lives over their estimated useful lives. The Company records an impairment charge on these assets when it determines that their carrying value may not be recoverable. The carrying value is not recoverable if it exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. When there is existence of one or more indicators of impairment, the Company measures any impairment of intangible assets based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by the Company’s management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in its business model. The Company’s estimates of future cash flows attributable to its other intangible assets require significant judgment based on the Company’s historical and anticipated results and are subject to many factors. See Note 9 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for more information about goodwill and other intangible assets.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-5, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The standard eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. An entity may present items of net income and other comprehensive income in one continuous statement, or in two separate, but consecutive statements. The change is intended to enhance comparability between entities that report under U.S. GAAP and those that report under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and to provide a more consistent method of presenting non-owner transactions that affect an entity’s equity. The guidance is effective as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2011, which corresponds to the Company’s first fiscal quarter beginning January 1, 2012. The Company currently reports other comprehensive income with net income in one statement and is in compliance with the standard.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 regarding fair value measurements and disclosures. This new guidance clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement guidance and revises certain measurement and disclosure requirements to achieve convergence with IFRS. This guidance is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2011, which corresponds to the Company’s first fiscal quarter beginning January 1, 2012. The Company is evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has a stock-based compensation plan, which is described in more detail in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements of the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 includes $0.8 million, $0.4 million, $1.5 million, and $0.8 million ($0.5 million, $0.3 million, $1.0 million and $0.5 million after-tax), respectively, of stock-based compensation costs which are primarily included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2011, there was $5.5 million ($3.6 million after-tax) of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock-based compensation that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years, of which $1.7 million ($1.1 million after-tax) of total stock-based compensation is expected to be recognized during the remainder of fiscal year 2011.

NOTE 2.   GULF OF MEXICO OIL SPILL DISASTER

As a result of the oil spill caused by the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010 and the subsequent temporary and intermittent closures of certain commercial and recreational fishing grounds by the Louisiana Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), Omega Protein’s total fish catch for 2010 was materially impacted. In addition, Omega Protein incurred costs associated with the temporary re-deployment of many of its Gulf of Mexico fishing vessels, costs to purchase fish meal from third party vendors to offset lost production, and increased costs per unit of production resulting from intermittent plant closures.

During 2010, Omega Protein filed a claim for damages with BP and also met with BP’s third party claims adjuster. On August 23, 2010, the claims process for BP was moved to the GCCF, a claims facility tasked with claims administration and payment distribution for those businesses and individuals that suffered damages and incurred other costs related to the oil spill.

On September 2 and October 19, 2010, Omega Protein received its first and second emergency payments from the GCCF of $7.3 million and $11.4 million, respectively. These payments were utilized in the following manner: 1) $0.6 million of the payments to offset previously recognized losses as of June 30, 2010 related to costs that were not able to be allocated to production as a result of intermittent

 

10


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

plant closures, 2) to offset costs Omega Protein incurred to purchase 6,315 tons of fish meal which partially offset lost production, and 3) to offset the high costs per unit of production Omega Protein incurred during the 2010 fishing season in the Gulf of Mexico as a result of the closure of its fishing grounds.

The majority of the first and second emergency payments were credited to the 2010 unallocated inventory cost pool (including off-season costs). Because both of these payments were included in the cost per unit of production calculation for the 2010 fishing season, cost of sales was partially reduced by 10.2% and 11.7%, or $3.0 million and $8.2 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. With the recognition of these amounts, the Company has completed recognizing the $18.7 million in payments applied to its inventory cost pool as a result of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster.

The Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster directly affected Omega Protein by decreasing its fish catch due to the closure of state and federal fishing grounds and increased the cost of its normal fishing effort due to the repositioning and staging of its fleet at other locations. The decrease in fish catch reduced Omega Protein’s volume of inventory available to sell which reduced its sales volumes and revenues for the third and fourth quarters of 2010. The decrease in fish catch and additional costs incurred related to Omega Protein’s 2010 standard cost were partially offset by the receipt of two GCCF emergency payments, as described above. Omega Protein cannot predict what effect the oil spill will have on future years’ fish catch or customer perceptions about its products.

In April 2011, the Company agreed to a final settlement of all of its claims for costs and damages incurred as a result of the oil spill caused by the Deepwater Horizon explosion. As a result of the settlement, on April 18, 2011 the Company received a final payment of $26.2 million, net of fees and expenses, from the GCCF. The amount was recognized as “(Proceeds/gains) losses resulting from Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster” in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

In total, the Company received payments of $44.8 million, net of fees and expenses, from the GCCF, including emergency payments of $7.3 million and $11.4 million in September and October of 2010, respectively. As a part of the final settlement, the Company released and waived all current and future claims against BP and all other potentially responsible parties with regard to the oil spill.

NOTE 3.   ACQUISITION OF CYVEX NUTRITION, INC.

A. Description of the Transaction

On December 16, 2010, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Cyvex Nutrition, Inc. (“Cyvex”), a California corporation, in a cash transaction pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement with the founder and sole shareholder of Cyvex. Cyvex now is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Cyvex is a premium, science-based nutraceutical supplier to dietary supplement manufacturers that focus on human health and wellness.

As total consideration for the acquisition of Cyvex, the Company paid cash of $13.1 million, utilizing cash on hand, with no contingent consideration. This amount includes final post-closing cash payments of $2.1 million made to Cyvex’s former owner during the first quarter of 2011. The $2.1 million was included in accrued liabilities at December 31, 2010. See Note 9 – Goodwill and other intangible assets.

B. Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The unaudited financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the Company and Cyvex on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of the period presented. The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had actually taken place at the beginning of the period presented and is not intended to be a projection of future results or trends.

 

    

  Revenue  

       Net income    
     (in thousands)  

2010 supplemental pro forma from April 1, 2010 – June 30, 2010

   $ 39,606           $ 2,309       

2010 supplemental pro forma from January 1, 2010 – June 30, 2010

   $ 74,799           $ 3,644       

NOTE 4. RECEIVABLES, NET

Receivables as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

11


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

     June 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 
     (in thousands)  

Trade

   $ 15,147           $ 10,739       

Insurance

     6,348             18       

2005 legal settlement

     787             —         

State income tax

     560             785       

Energy swap settlements

     397             —         

Other

     59             154       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total receivables

     23,298             11,696       

Less: allowance for doubtful accounts

     (228)            (204)      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Receivables, net

   $     23,070           $     11,492       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2011, the current insurance receivable includes approximately $5.7 million related to the salvage costs incurred by the Company and the net insured value of the Sandy Point as a result of its sinking in May 2011.

NOTE 5.   INVENTORY

The major classes of inventory as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

     June 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 
     (in thousands)  

Fish meal

   $ 27,172           $ 43,945       

Fish oil

     11,429                 13,159       

Fish solubles

     1,737             947       

Nutraceutical products

     1,541             1,535       

Unallocated inventory cost pool (including off-season costs)

         29,975             7,368       

Other materials and supplies

     9,916             7,738       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total inventory

   $ 81,770           $ 74,692       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Inventory at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is stated at the lower of cost or market. The elements of the June 30, 2011 unallocated inventory cost pool include Omega Protein’s plant and vessel related labor, utilities, rent, repairs and depreciation, to be allocated to inventories produced through the 2011 fishing season.

As a result of the oil spill caused by the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010 and the subsequent temporary and intermittent closures of certain commercial and recreational fishing grounds by the Louisiana Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), Omega Protein’s fish processing was temporarily interrupted at its three Gulf Coast facilities. As a result of this interruption, intermittent fishing grounds and facilities closures and the oil spill’s estimated impact on Omega Protein’s 2010 Gulf of Mexico fishing season, Omega Protein filed a claim for damages with BP and, subsequently, with the GCCF, a claims facility tasked with claims administration and payment distribution for those businesses and individuals that suffered damages and incurred other costs related to the oil spill. The majority of the first and second emergency payments of $7.3 million and $11.4 million, respectively, received from the GCCF were credited to the 2010 unallocated inventory cost pool to offset the cost to purchase 6,315 tons of fishmeal to satisfy forward sales contracts and to offset the high cost per unit of production Omega Protein incurred during the 2010 fishing season in the Gulf of Mexico as a result of the closure of its fishing grounds. With the recognition of these amounts, the Company has completed recognizing the $18.7 million in payments applied to its inventory cost pool as a result of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster.

NOTE 6.   PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Prepaid expenses and other current assets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below:

 

     June 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 
     (in thousands)  

Prepaid insurance

   $ 3,312           $ 1,535       

 

12


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

Energy swap asset

     1,863             743       

Selling expenses

     765             771       

Guarantee fees

     14             24       

Leases

     133             94       

Other prepaids and expenses

     235             474       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other assets, net

   $     6,322           $     3,641       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amounts included in prepaid expenses and other current assets consist primarily of prepaid operating expenses including insurance, rents, and selling expenses. Energy swap assets are valued at each reporting date at their fair market value (see Note 17 – Fair Value Disclosures for additional information). Prepaid selling expenses are expensed in those periods in which the related revenue is recognized.

NOTE 7.   OTHER ASSETS

Other assets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

     June 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 
     (in thousands)  

Fish nets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,709 and $1,112

   $ 1,896           $ 1,281       

Insurance receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts

     5,810             1,171       

Title XI debt issuance costs

     349             316       

Other debt issuance costs

     174             244       

Deposits and other

     43             39       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other assets, net

   $     8,272           $     3,051       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the long-term insurance receivable of $5.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, primarily relates to Jones Act claims for employees aboard its vessels. This estimated amount is recorded gross of estimated claims which may be due to claimants and is included in accrued insurance liabilities.

Amortization expense for fishing nets amounted to approximately $0.3 million, $0.3 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the allowance for doubtful insurance receivable accounts was $0.2 million.

NOTE 8.   PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

     June 30, 2011      December 31,
2010
 
     (in thousands)  

Land

   $ 7,690           $ 7,690       

Plant assets

     128,710             128,904       

Fishing vessels

     99,003             101,201       

Furniture and fixtures

     6,495             6,360       

Construction in progress

     8,136             3,294       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total property and equipment

     250,034             247,449       

Less: accumulated depreciation

     (138,830)            (135,723)      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   $     111,204           $     111,726       
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Depreciation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $3.6 million, $3.4 million, $7.2 million and $6.5 million, respectively.

The Company capitalizes interest as part of the acquisition cost of a qualifying asset. Interest is capitalized only during the period of time required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company capitalized interest of approximately $35,900, $26,300, $51,900 and $84,100, respectively.

NOTE 9.   GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

13


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill resulting from the Company’s acquisition of Cyvex in December 2010 (in thousands):

 

January 1, 2011

   $     6,916     

Acquisition – additional costs (1)

     50     
        

June 30, 2011

   $ 6,966     
        

(1) On December 16, 2010, the Company acquired Cyvex Nutrition, Inc., and the allocation of the purchase price over the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired resulted in $6.9 million of goodwill. During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, a final post-closing payment was made to account for differences between estimated and actual working capital of Cyvex as of the closing date. The final payment included an adjustment of $50,000 to the base purchase price that was recorded as additional goodwill.

The intangible assets, other than goodwill as described above, acquired in the Cyvex acquisition were as follows (in thousands, except for weighted-average life):

 

        June 30,    
2011
        December 31,    
2010
    Weighted
Average
Life

Carrying value of intangible assets subject to amortization:

     

Customer relationships, net

      $     2,916              $     3,070          10
                 

Total intangible assets subject to amortization, net

      $ 2,916              $ 3,070         

Indefinite life intangible assets - tradenames:

    716            716         
                 

Total intangible assets

      $ 3,632              $ 3,786         
                 

Amortization expense of intangible assets for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 was $77,000 and $154,000, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):

 

Remainder of 2011

   $ 153       

2012

     307       

2013

     307       

2014

     307       

2015

     307       

Thereafter

     1,535       
        

Total estimated future amortization expense

   $     2,916       
        

NOTE 10.   NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s long-term debt consisted of the following:

 

    June 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
    (in thousands)  

U.S. government guaranteed obligations (Title XI loans) collateralized by a first lien on certain vessels and certain plant assets:

   

Amounts due in installments through 2025, interest from 5.7% to 7.6%

  $ 31,686          $ 33,147       

Amounts due in installments through 2014, interest at Eurodollar rates plus 0.5% (0.8% and 0.7% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively)

    134            154       
               

Total debt

    31,820            33,301       

Less current maturities

    (2,997)           (2,994)      
               

Long-term debt

  $     28,823          $     30,307       
               

 

14


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

The Title XI loans are secured by liens on certain of the Company’s fishing vessels and mortgages on the Company’s Reedville, Virginia and Abbeville, Louisiana plants.

On June 20, 2011, pursuant to the Title XI program, the United States Department of Commerce Fisheries Finance Program (the “FFP”) approved a third financing application made by the Company in the amount of $10.0 million (the “Third Approval Letter”). To date, the Company has not submitted any financing requests under the Third Approval Letter.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the $35 million revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and approximately $3.4 million in letters of credit issued primarily in support of worker’s compensation insurance programs. The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements other than normal operating leases and standby letters of credit. Additionally, as of June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under its bank loan agreement.

NOTE 11.   CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION

On May 29, 2008 and July 10, 2008, the Company entered into capital lease agreements to lease barges for a period of 5 years. Following is a summary of future minimum payments under the capitalized lease agreements (in thousands):

 

Remainder of 2011

     284       

2012

     580       

2013

     277       
        

Total minimum lease payments

     1,141       

Less amount representing interest

     (123)      
        

Present value of minimum payments

         1,018       

Less current portion of capital lease obligation

     (476)      
        

Long-term capital lease obligation

   $ 542       
        

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, assets recorded under capital lease obligations are included in property, plant and equipment, net as follows (in thousands):

 

    

June 30,

2011

    

December 31,

2010

 

Fishing vessels and marine equipment, at cost

   $     2,076           $     2,076       

Less accumulated depreciation

     (1,263)            (1,056)      
                 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   $ 813           $ 1,020       
                 

NOTE 12.   ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

     June 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 
     (in thousands)  

Insurance

   $ 10,820           $ 8,246       

Salary and benefits

     9,347             3,911       

Trade creditors

     7,150             2,730       

Federal income tax

     3,493             —       

Taxes, other than federal income tax

     1,022             73       

Deferred revenue

     806             3,357       

Amounts due relating to Cyvex acquisition

     —             2,036       

Fair market value of interest rate swap, current portion

     394             623       

Accrued interest

     257             262       

Other

     1             122       
                 

Total accrued liabilities

   $     33,290           $     21,360       
                 

NOTE 13.   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Contingencies

 

15


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

On May 18, 2011, the Company’s fishing vessel, F/V Sandy Point, was involved in a collision with a commercial cargo vessel, Eurus London. As a result of the collision, the Company’s vessel sank and three Company crew members died. The Company has filed a limitation action under maritime law to limit its potential liability for the incident to $50,000, the value of the sunken vessel, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. A representative of one of the deceased crewmembers has filed a lawsuit against the Company alleging damages under various theories of liability. Any claims arising from the incident will be covered by the Company’s insurance program, subject to customary deductibles which are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial results or results of operations.

In conjunction with the sinking of the vessel, the Company recorded an insurance receivable of approximately $4.0 million related primarily to costs expended salvaging the sunken vessel from the Mississippi ship channel and a receivable of $1.8 million related to the net insurance value of the vessel.

In March 2010, the Company was named as one of the defendants in a lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, by Chris Manthey, Benson Chiles and Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation (the “Proposition 65 Matter”). The other defendants in the lawsuit are CVS Pharmacy, Inc., General Nutrition Corporation, New Health Group, Inc., Pharmavite LLC, Rite Aid Corporation, Solgar, Inc., and Twinlab Corporation. The plaintiffs allege that fish oil dietary supplements produced by the defendants do not have adequate warnings regarding possible exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as required by Proposition 65 under California law, and request that the court grant injunctive relief and award monetary civil penalties. The Company’s total fish oil supplement sales in the State of California since inception have been approximately $6,200. The Company believes that its products comply fully with federal law promulgated by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration, standards of the European Commission and state law, including California, and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The Company does not believe that the resolution of this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had a $0.2 million accrual related to this matter.

Regulatory Matters

The Company is subject to various possible claims and lawsuits regarding environmental matters. Management believes that costs, if any, related to these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, cash flows or financial position of the Company.

In April 2010, the Company received a request for information pursuant to Section 308 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) from Region 3 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) concerning the Company’s wastewater practices used in its fishing operations at its Reedville, Virginia facility. The Company has responded to the request. The Company believes it has been in compliance with all applicable laws with regard to wastewater practices. The Company cannot predict the outcome of the EPA’s review.

In February 2011, the United States Coast Guard conducted an inspection of the vessels at the Company’s Reedville, Virginia facility regarding the Company’s vessel bilge water disposal practices. Based on the results of this inspection and subsequent correspondence and discussions with the Coast Guard, the Company has conducted a full survey of its Reedville, Virginia fishing fleet to determine compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The survey has been submitted to the Coast Guard. Based on the Company’s preliminary findings and discussions with the Coast Guard, two of the Company’s Reedville based fishing vessels were temporarily delayed from fishing at the early May 2011 commencement of the Atlantic fishing season. Both of these vessels returned to full operations after the beginning of the fishing season. Although the Company does not expect such delay to materially impact its Atlantic fishing operations, the Company cannot predict the outcome of the Coast Guard review. The Company anticipates spending approximately $3.0 million to make the necessary improvements and repairs to all of its Reedville vessels.

NOTE 14.   RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED PER SHARE DATA (in thousands except per share date)

 

     Earnings
(Numerator)
     Shares
(Denominator)
     Per Share
Data
 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

        

Net earnings

       $     22,905             —            
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Basic earnings per common share:

        

Earnings available to common shareholders

       $ 22,905             19,343               $     1.18       
        

 

 

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

        

 

16


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

Stock options assumed exercised

     —               798          
                    

Diluted earnings per common share:

        

Earnings available to common shareholders plus
stock options assumed exercised

       $     22,905                 20,141               $     1.14       
                          
     Earnings
(Numerator)
     Shares
(Denominator)
     Per Share
Data
 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

        

Net Earnings

       $     1,983             —            
                    

Basic earnings per common share:

        

Earnings available to common shareholders

       $ 1,983                 18,818               $     0.11       
              

Effect of dilutive securities:

        

Stock options assumed exercised

     —               59          
                    

Diluted earnings per common share:

        

Earnings available to common shareholders plus
stock options assumed exercised

       $ 1,983                 18,877               $ 0.11       
                          
     Earnings
(Numerator)
     Shares
(Denominator)
     Per Share
Data
 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

        

Net earnings

       $     28,859             —            
                    

Basic earnings per common share:

        

Earnings available to common shareholders

       $ 28,859                 19,112               $     1.51       
              

Effect of dilutive securities:

        

Stock options assumed exercised

     —               754          
                    

Diluted earnings per common share:

        

Earnings available to common shareholders plus
stock options assumed exercised

       $ 28,859                 19,866               $ 1.45       
                          
     Earnings
(Numerator)
     Shares
(Denominator)
     Per Share
Data
 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

        

Net earnings

       $     2,962             —            
                    

Basic earnings per common share:

        

Earnings available to common shareholders

       $ 2,962                 18,779               $     0.16       
              

Effect of dilutive securities:

        

Stock options assumed exercised

     —               37          
                    

Diluted earnings per common share:

        

Earnings available to common shareholders plus
stock options assumed exercised

       $ 2,962                 18,816               $ 0.16       
                          

 

17


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

Options to purchase 135,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $13.41 to $14.69 per share were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the adjusted exercise prices of the options based upon the assumed proceeds were greater than the average market price of the shares during that period.

Options to purchase 1,470,702 and 2,092,402 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $4.19 to $15.88 per share and $4.00 to $15.88 per share were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the adjusted exercise prices of the options based upon the assumed proceeds were greater than the average market price of the shares during that period.

NOTE 15.   COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST

 

     Three Months Ended
June  30,
     Six Months Ended
June  30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  
     (in thousands)      (in thousands)  

Service cost

       $ —               $ —              $ —               $ —       

Interest cost

     319             340             638             679       

Expected return on plan assets

     (315)            (285)            (630)            (570)      

Amortization of prior service costs

     —             —             —             —       

Amortization of net loss

     294             287             588             574       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost

       $     298               $     342               $     596               $     683       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company contributed approximately $0.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively, to the Company’s pension plan. The Company expects to make contributions of $1.2 million to the pension plan during the remainder of 2011.

NOTE 16.   HURRICANE LOSSES, INSURANCE RECOVERIES AND OTHER PROCEEDS

2008 Hurricane

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, Omega Protein received a grant of $0.2 million from the State of Louisiana Hurricane Gustav and Ike Fisheries Recovery Program. The grant provided assistance for commercial fishing owners impacted by Hurricanes Gustav and Ike in 2008. The grant proceeds were recognized as “Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net – 2008 storms” in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income. No similar grants were received during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

2005 Hurricane Activity

On August 31, 2007, the Company filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Harris, Texas 295th Judicial District, against its prior insurance broker, Aon Risk Services of Texas, who procured the Company’s property insurance policies for the 2005/2006 policy year, which were the subject of prior litigation as a result of claims relating to Hurricanes Rita and Katrina. In June 2011, all outstanding claims related to the lawsuit were settled and the Company recorded $0.8 million, net of fees and expenses, as “Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net – 2005 storms” in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. As a part of the final settlement, the Company released and waived all claims against Aon for all matters addressed in the litigation.

NOTE 17.   FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

The following disclosures of the estimated fair value of financial instruments are made in accordance with the requirements of FASB ASC 825-10-50, Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies and are described in the following paragraphs.

 

18


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

Fair value estimates are subject to certain inherent limitations. Estimates of fair value are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. The estimated fair values of financial instruments presented below are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company might realize in actual market transactions. Estimates of fair value are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these items. For non-financial assets, such as goodwill, carrying values are compared to fair value on an annual basis as required by impairment standards and the carrying value is reduced when determined necessary as a result of impairment testing. At June 30, 2011, the Company had no borrowings under its bank credit facility except for $3.4 million in letters of credit support obligations.

The carrying values and respective fair market values of the Company’s long-term debt are presented below (in thousands). The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices available to the Company for issuance of similar debt with similar terms at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

 

     June 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 

Long-term Debt:

     

Carrying Value

   $ 31,820       $ 33,301   

Estimated Fair Market Value

   $ 32,719       $ 34,631   

The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. As required by FASB ASC 820-10, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

 

     June 30, 2011  
     Fair Value Measurements Using      Assets
(Liabilities) at
Fair Value
 
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3     

Assets (Liabilities) (in thousands)

           

Energy swap asset

   $ —             $ 2,084          $ —             $ 2,084       

Interest rate swap liability

     —               —               (394)            (394)      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets (Liabilities)

   $ —             $ 2,084          $ (394)          $ 1,690       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     December 31, 2010  
     Fair Value Measurements Using      Assets
(Liabilities) at
Fair Value
 
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3     

Assets (Liabilities) (in thousands)

           

Energy swap asset

   $ —             $ 766          $     —             $     766       

Interest rate swap liability

   $ —             $     —             $ (721)          $ (721)      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets (Liabilities)

   $     —             $ 766          $ (721)          $ 45       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The determination of the fair values above incorporates various factors required under FASB ASC 820-10. These factors include not only the credit standing of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits, letters of credit and priority interests), but also the impact of the Company’s nonperformance risk on its liabilities.

The fair value of the interest rate swap liability is determined using an income valuation model based on the present value of expected future cash flows as determined by comparing the Company’s rate to the Euro-dollar futures curve. This model includes inputs

 

19


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued)

 

or significant value drivers which might not be observable in or corroborated by the market. When such inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized in Level 3.

The fair value of the diesel, Bunker C, and natural gas energy swaps is derived from the underlying market price of similar instruments at a specific valuation date. The underlying market price for the diesel and natural gas swaps is based upon the NYMEX Futures Curve. The underlying market price for the Bunker C swaps is based upon the Platts Forward Curves HP 0.3% and 1.0% for 2011 and the Platts Forward Curve HP 1.0% for 2012. These methods rely upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets. When such inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized in Level 2.

The following table provides a reconciliation of all assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis which use Level 3 or significant unobservable inputs or significant value drivers for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands). There have been no transfers between the hierarchy levels for the periods presented.

 

     Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3 Inputs)
 
     Three Months Ended
June 30,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
         2011              2010              2011              2010      

Beginning liability balance

   $ (549)          $ (1,177)          $ (721)          $ (1,251)      

Net loss reclassified into interest expense related to interest rate swap transactions unrealized

     (14)            (89)            (27)            (274)      

Net change associated with current period interest rate swap transactions realized

             169                     241                     354                     500       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending liability balance

   $ (394)          $ (1,025)          $ (394)          $ (1,025)      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

20


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the Company’s MD&A and Risk Factors contained in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “2010 Form 10-K”), and in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in this report and in the 2010 Form 10-K.

Forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q, future filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), the Company’s press releases and oral statements by authorized officers of the Company are intended to be subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty. The Company believes that forward-looking statements made by it are based on reasonable expectations; however, no assurances can be given that actual results will not differ materially from those contained in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include the words “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “predict,” “assume,” “believe,” “could,” “would,” “hope,” “may,” or similar expressions.

General

Omega Protein Corporation is a nutritional ingredient company and the largest processor, marketer and distributor of fish meal and fish oil products in the United States. As used herein, the term the “Company” refers to Omega Protein Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, as applicable. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 2105 City West Boulevard, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77042-2838 (Telephone: (713) 623-0060).

The Company operates through three primary subsidiaries: Omega Protein, Inc., Omega Shipyard, Inc. and Cyvex Nutrition, Inc. Omega Protein, Inc. (“Omega Protein”), the Company’s principal operating subsidiary, operates in the menhaden processing business and is the successor to a business conducted since 1913. Omega Shipyard, Inc. (“Omega Shipyard”) owns a drydock facility in Moss Point, Mississippi that is used to provide shoreside maintenance for Omega Protein’s fishing fleet and, subject to outside demand and excess capacity, occasionally for third-party vessels. Cyvex Nutrition, Inc. (“Cyvex”), founded in 1984 and acquired by the Company on December 16, 2010, is located in Irvine, California and participates in the nutraceutical industry as an ingredient provider. Revenues from Omega Shipyard for third-party vessel work were not material during the first six months of 2011. The Company also has a number of other immaterial direct and indirect subsidiaries.

Omega Protein produces and sells a variety of protein and oil products derived from menhaden, a species of wild herring-like fish found along the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coasts. The fish are not genetically modified or enhanced. Omega Protein markets several grades of fish meal, as well as fish oil and fish solubles. Omega Protein’s fish meal products are primarily used as a protein ingredient in animal feed for aquaculture, swine, and household pets. Fish oil is used for animal and aquaculture feeds, industrial applications, additives to human food products and as dietary supplements. Omega Protein’s fish solubles are sold primarily to bait manufacturers, aquaculture feed manufacturers and for use as an organic fertilizer.

All of Omega Protein’s products contain healthy long-chain Omega-3 fatty acids. Omega-3 fatty acids are commonly referred to as “essential fatty acids” because human and animal bodies do not produce them. Instead, essential fatty acids must be obtained from outside sources, such as food or special supplements. Long-chain Omega-3s are also commonly referred to as a “good fat” for their health benefits, as opposed to “bad fats” that create or aggravate health conditions through long-term consumption. Scientific research suggests that long-chain Omega-3s as part of a balanced diet may provide significant benefits for health issues such as cardiovascular disease, inflammatory conditions and other ailments.

Under its production process, Omega Protein produces OmegaPure ® , a taste-free, odorless refined fish oil which is the only marine source of long-chain Omega-3s directly affirmed (as opposed to self affirmed) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) as a food ingredient that is Generally Recognized as Safe (“GRAS”).

Omega Protein operates four menhaden processing plants: two in Louisiana, one in Mississippi and one in Virginia. It also operates a Health and Science Center in Reedville, Virginia, which provides 100-metric tons per day fish oil processing capacity for the Company’s food, industrial and feed grade oils. Omega Protein’s technical center in Houston, Texas, the OmegaPure Technology and Innovation Center, has food science application labs as well as analytical, sensory, lipids research and pilot plant capabilities.

On December 16, 2010, the Company acquired Cyvex, a dietary supplement ingredient supplier based in Irvine, California. Cyvex is a premium, science-based nutraceutical supplier to dietary supplement manufacturers that focus on human health and wellness. The Company believes that the acquisition of Cyvex will expand its presence in the human health and wellness market and

 

21


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

will provide access to the top supplement manufacturers who purchase a variety of ingredients, including fish oil. Prior to the acquisition, Cyvex’s unaudited revenues for 2010 were approximately $11.3 million.

Company Overview

Menhaden Fishing

2011 Fishing Information.     At June 30, 2011, Omega Protein owned a fleet of 47 fishing vessels and 34 spotter aircraft for use in its fishing operations and also leased additional aircraft where necessary to facilitate operations. During the 2011 fishing season in the Gulf of Mexico, which runs from mid-April through October, Omega Protein is operating 28 fishing and carry vessels and 28 spotter aircraft. The fishing area in the Gulf is generally located along the Gulf Coast, with a concentration off the Louisiana and Mississippi coasts. The fishing season along the Atlantic coast began in early May and usually extends into December. Omega Protein is operating 9 fishing vessels and 7 spotter aircraft along the Mid-Atlantic coast, concentrated primarily in and around Virginia and North Carolina. The remaining fleet of fishing vessels and spotter aircraft are not routinely operated during the fishing season and are back-up to the active fleet, used for other transportation purposes, inactive or in the process of refurbishment in the Company’s shipyard. Historical fish catch and production results at the end of the second quarter for the past five years are as follows:

 

     2011      2010      2009      2008      2007  

Fish Catch in Tons as of June 30,

     188,403         166,552         139,136         149,275         155,311   

Fish meal, oil and solubles production in tons (excludes refined)

     65,848         58,164         55,570         61,814         57,234   

The Company cautions that, because of the volatility of fish catch generally, partial year catch numbers are not indicative of results that may be expected for a full year. In addition, fish oil yields, which affect inventory costs and volumes available for sale, fluctuate from year to year and month to month. Through June 30, 2011, for example, the Company’s fish oil yield for the six months ending June 30, 2011 has been 6.9% compared to a historical five year average of 9.8%.

As previously disclosed, Omega Protein has designed a single catamaran-style test vessel which, if successful, might be able to replace Omega Protein’s traditional two purse boat fishing method. Omega Protein had tested this prototype catamaran vessel during the 2010 and 2011 fishing seasons. Based on its test results to date and its other vessel manpower requirements, Omega Protein has suspended testing of the catamaran test vessel for the balance of the 2011 fishing season. The Company intends to evaluate at a later date whether to continue to test this catamaran prototype, or create and test a new re-configured catamaran design based on its experience to date.

Sales Contracts.     Omega Protein sells a sizeable portion of its products on a two-to-twelve-month forward contract basis with the balance sold on a spot basis through purchase orders. Omega Protein’s sales contracts generally contain force majeure and other production allocation provisions. Due to the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster, Omega Protein purchased additional fish meal from a third party to supplement its production and received reimbursement from BP through the GCCF for additional costs associated with this purchase. Historically, fish meal and fish oil sold on a forward contract basis has fluctuated from year-to-year based upon perceived market availability and forward price expectations. As of July 11, 2011, Omega Protein had either sold or sold forward on a contract basis approximately 130,200 tons of fish meal, 57,000 tons of fish oil and 7,400 tons of fish solubles for 2011.

Omega Protein’s annual revenues are highly dependent on pricing, annual fish catch, production yields and inventories and, in addition, inventory is generally carried over from one year to the next year. Omega Protein determines the level of inventory to be carried over based on existing contracts, prevailing market prices of the products and anticipated customer usage and demand during the off-season. Thus, production volume does not necessarily correlate with sales volume in the same year and sales volumes will fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter. Omega Protein’s fish meal products have a useable life of approximately one year from date of production. Practically, however, Omega Protein attempts to empty its warehouses of the previous season’s products by the second or third month of the new fishing season. Omega Protein’s crude fish oil products do not lose efficacy unless exposed to oxygen and, therefore, their storage life typically is longer than that of fish meal.

Revenues by Product.     The following tables set forth Omega Protein’s revenues by product (in millions) and the approximate percentage of total revenues represented thereby, for the indicated periods:

 

     Three Months Ended June 30,  
     2011      2010  
     Revenues      Percent      Revenues      Percent  

Fish Meal

           

Regular Grade

   $ 5.2               11.9%         $ 6.8               18.8%     

Special Select

     21.5             48.6              13.8             38.0        

Sea-Lac

     3.0             6.8              2.5             6.9        

Fish Oil

           

Crude Oil

     5.9             13.3              8.5             23.4        

Refined Oil

     3.6             8.1              3.2             8.8        

Other Nutritional Ingredients

     3.7             8.4              —               —          

Fish Solubles and Other

     1.3             2.9              1.5             4.1        
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $     44.2               100.0%         $     36.3               100.0%     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

22


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

     Six Months Ended June 30,  
     2011      2010  
     Revenues      Percent      Revenues      Percent  

Fish Meal

           

Regular Grade

   $ 12.0             11.8%         $ 12.5             18.2%     

Special Select

     51.2             50.9              27.7             40.4        

Sea-Lac

     5.9             5.9              4.8             7.0        

Fish Oil

           

Crude Oil

     14.4             14.3              13.8             20.1        

Refined Oil

     8.2             8.2              6.5             9.5        

Other Nutritional Ingredients

     6.5             6.5              —             —        

Fish Solubles and Other

     2.4             2.4              3.3             4.8        
                                   

Total

   $     100.6               100.0%         $     68.6               100.0%     
                                   

Customers and Marketing.     Most of Omega Protein’s marine protein products are sold directly to approximately 320 customers by Omega Protein’s agriproducts sales department, while a smaller amount is sold through independent sales agents. Not including Cyvex, Omega Protein’s finished product inventory was $40.3 million as of June 30, 2011 versus $58.1 million as of December 31, 2010.

A number of countries in which Omega Protein currently sells products impose various tariffs and duties, none of which have a significant impact on Omega Protein’s foreign sales. Certain of these duties have been reduced in recent years for certain countries under the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Uruguay Round Agreement of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. In all cases, Omega Protein’s products are shipped to its customers either by FOB shipping point or CIF terms, and therefore, the customer is responsible for any tariffs, duties or other levies imposed on Omega Protein’s products sold into these markets.

During the off season, Omega Protein fills purchase orders from the inventory it has accumulated during the fishing season or in some cases, by re-selling meal and oil purchased from other suppliers. Generally, prices for Omega Protein’s products tend to be lower during the fishing season when product is more abundant than in the off season. Throughout the entire year, prices are often significantly influenced by supply and demand in world markets for competing products, primarily other global sources of fish meal and oil, and also soybean meal for its fish meal products, and vegetable oils for its fish oil products when used as an alternative.

Purchases and Sales of Third-Party Meal and Oils .    Omega Protein has from time to time purchased fish meal and fish oil from other domestic and international manufacturers. These purchase and resale transactions have supplemented Omega Protein’s base manufacturing and sales business.

Occasionally Omega Protein’s fish catch and resultant product inventories are reduced, primarily due to adverse weather conditions, and Omega Protein further expands its purchase and resale of other fish meals and oils (primarily Panamanian, Peruvian and Mexican fish meal and U.S. menhaden fish meal and oil). Although operating margins from these activities are less than the margins typically generated from Omega Protein’s base domestic production, these operations provide Omega Protein with a source of fish meal and oil to sell into other markets, some of which Omega Protein has not historically had a presence. Omega Protein did not purchase any fish meal or fish oil during 2008. During 2009, Omega Protein purchased approximately 11,000 tons of menhaden fish meal, or approximately 7.6% of fish meal sales volumes for 2009. During 2010, due to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster, Omega Protein purchased 6,315 tons of fish meal, or 6.2% of its fish meal sales volumes for 2010. During the first six months of 2011 the Company did not purchase any fish meal or fish oil.

Competition.     Omega Protein competes with a smaller domestic privately-owned menhaden fishing company and with international marine protein and oil producers, including Mexican sardine processors and South American anchovy and mackerel processors. In addition, but to a lesser extent, the Company’s marine protein and oil business is also subject to significant competition from producers of vegetable and other animal protein products and oil products such as Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill. Many of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources and more extensive and diversified operations than those of the Company.

 

23


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

Omega Protein competes on price, quality and performance characteristics of its products, such as protein level and amino acid profile in the case of fish meal. The principal competition for Omega Protein’s fish meal and fish solubles is from other global production of marine proteins as well as other protein sources such as soybean meal and other vegetable or animal protein products. Other globally produced fish oils provide the primary market competition for Omega Protein’s fish oil, as well as soybean and rapeseed oil. Omega Protein believes, however, that these other non-marine sources are not complete substitutes because fish meal and oil offer nutritional values not contained in such other sources.

Fish meal prices have historically borne a relationship to prevailing soybean meal prices (more weakly correlated in recent years), while prices for fish oil are generally influenced by prices for vegetable oils, such as rapeseed, soybean and palm oils. Thus, the prices for Omega Protein’s products are established by worldwide supply and demand relationships over which Omega Protein has no control and tend to fluctuate significantly over the course of a year and from year to year.

Regulation.     Omega Protein’s operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the locations and periods in which fishing may be conducted as well as environmental and safety matters. At the state and local level, certain state and local government agencies have enacted legislation or regulations which prohibit, restrict or regulate menhaden fishing within their jurisdictional waters.

Omega Protein’s menhaden fishing operations are also subject to regulation by two interstate compact commissions created by federal law: the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (“ASMFC”) which consists of 15 states along the Atlantic Coast, and the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission which consists of 5 states along the Gulf of Mexico. The ASMFC manages the menhaden fishery throughout the stock’s coast-wide range. In 2005, the ASMFC recommended precautionary restrictions on the Chesapeake Bay menhaden harvest, despite its finding that menhaden were not overfished and that overfishing was not occurring on a coast wide basis, in order to determine whether localized depletion was occurring in Chesapeake Bay.

In February 2007, the Commonwealth of Virginia declined to adopt an ASMFC recommended plan but instead adopted its own restrictions whereby Omega Protein’s Chesapeake Bay menhaden harvest was capped for a five year period at a five-year average (2001 to 2005) of 109,020 metric tons per year. The Virginia restrictions also allow for a credit whereby any under-harvest in a particular year below the 109,020 metric ton cap would be added to increase the cap for the following year, up to a maximum of 122,740 metric tons per year. The Company supported Virginia’s proposal and voluntarily complied with its limitations in 2006 and subsequently thereafter after the cap was formally in place. The cap had no effect on Omega Protein’s Chesapeake Bay harvests in 2007, 2008, 2009 or 2010 and is not expected to have any material adverse effect on its Chesapeake Bay harvest in 2011. As a result of the underharvest in 2010, the 2011 Chesapeake Bay catch limit will be 122,740 metric tons.

The Company supports the ASMFC’s goal of maintaining a healthy population of menhaden and the current research program designed to answer ecological questions regarding menhaden in the Chesapeake Bay and coast-wide. The Chesapeake Bay cap was established as a precautionary measure while research is conducted to address, among other things, the question whether the menhaden harvest in the Bay could cause what is being termed “localized depletion” of menhaden there. No evidence of such localized depletion has been produced.

Because the research regarding menhaden is on-going, in 2009 the ASMFC and Virginia approved an extension of the existing Chesapeake Bay cap for an additional three years to 2013. Even though no evidence of localized depletion has been produced, the Company continues to support the Chesapeake Bay cap as a way to maintain the status quo while research on these matters continues.

The most recent stock assessment for the Atlantic menhaden was completed in 2010 using data collected through 2008. According to federal and ASMFC technical experts, the assessment found that the Atlantic menhaden stock had undergone slight overfishing in one year, 2008; however, the population is not considered overfished, meaning that the stock abundance remains at or near target levels, above levels of concern, and can produce enough eggs to replace itself. The assessment indicated that the population was subject to slight overfishing in 2008 by an estimated four-tenths of one percent. More specifically, multiple runs of the stock assessment model revealed that there was a 53% probability that overfishing had occurred and a 47% probability that overfishing had not occurred.

In March 2011, the ASMFC initiated a review regulatory process which if enacted would: (1) require annual updates on menhaden recruits, or the numbers of fish in their first year of life, currently reviewed only every three years; (2) begin a process of developing management reference points for identifying the relative status of the stock using broad ecosystem indicators; and (3) establish interim management targets and consider regulatory tools to assist managers in achieving these targets. The interim management reference point target will be based on achieving 15% of the spawning potential the Atlantic menhaden stock would have if such stock were unfished. By comparison, in 2008, the estimate of this so-called “spawning potential ratio” was estimated to be 9%; however, those numbers have not been estimated for 2009 and 2010. The Company expects that such reassessment will not occur until the next stock assessment in 2012. These percentages do not necessarily translate into a corresponding percentage or

 

24


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

proportionate reduction in the Company’s Atlantic fish catch due to other factors which have yet to be determined such as the period of time under review, projections of stock size in years since 2008, recruitment, and other factors that have not yet been determined by the ASMFC.

The Company is unable to predict whether any management measures might be necessary for the 2012 fishing season or beyond. The earliest an ASMFC rulemaking process could be initiated is August 2011, so the Company does not expect any new constraints to be placed upon the fishery in 2011. Potential measures could include quotas, limitations on the number of days fished annually, a shortened season, no action, or other measures.

It is possible that this process could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial results and results of operations.

Dietary Supplement Ingredients

On December 16, 2010, the Company acquired Cyvex Nutrition, Inc., a dietary supplement ingredient supplier based in Irvine, California. Cyvex is a premium, science-based nutraceutical supplier to dietary supplement manufacturers that focus on human health and wellness. Prior to acquisition, Cyvex’s unaudited revenues for 2010 were approximately $11.3 million.

The FDA defines a dietary supplement to be a product taken by mouth that contains a dietary ingredient intended to supplement the diet. Dietary ingredients may include vitamins, minerals, herbs or other botanicals, amino acids, and substances such as enzymes, organ tissues, glandulars, and metabolites. Dietary supplement ingredients can also be in the form of extracts or concentrates. Dietary supplements may be manufactured and sold in many forms, such as tablets, capsules, softgels, gelcaps, liquids, or powders. Cyvex markets and sells an extensive list of nutraceutical ingredients derived from fruit, krill, vegetable and botanicals.

Cyvex markets its proprietary brands of dietary supplement ingredients through an integrated marketing program that includes internet, print, public relations and direct sales to companies manufacturing dietary supplements in all their forms (i.e. capsules, tablets and softgels). Cyvex also directs and participates in clinical research studies, often in collaboration with scientists and research institutions, to validate the benefits or a product and provide scientific support for product claims and marketing initiatives.

More information concerning Cyvex’s products, markets, competition, and regulation may be found in the “Business” section of the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The methods, estimates and judgments used in applying the Company’s critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The SEC has defined the critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and operating results, and requires the Company to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are highly uncertain at the time of estimation. Based on this definition, the Company’s most critical policies include: valuation of inventory (Notes 1 and 5 in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “2010 Form 10-K”)), valuation of losses related to Jones Act and worker’s compensation insurance claims (Note 1 in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K), valuation of income and deferred taxes (Notes 1 and 12 in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K) and the valuation of pension plan obligations (Notes 1 and 14 in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K).

Specifically with respect to inventory, Omega Protein’s per unit cost of production is estimated prior to the beginning of each fishing season based on total estimated fishing costs (including off-season costs) divided by estimated total units of production. Omega Protein adjusts the cost of sales, unallocated inventory cost pool and inventory balances at the end of the second, third and fourth quarters based on revised estimates of total units of production to total inventoriable costs. For the most part, Omega Protein begins selling its current season’s production during the third quarter and sells that production until the second quarter of the following year. From 2006 to 2009, the average cost per unit of production estimate increased 3% from the third quarter to the fourth

 

25


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

quarter of each respective year. During 2010, as a result of the larger than anticipated production in the fourth quarter, cost per unit of production for the 2010 fourth quarter decreased 9% as compared to the 2010 third quarter.

The Company also has other key accounting policies and accounting estimates relating to the allowance of doubtful accounts (Note 1 in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K), goodwill and other intangible assets (Notes 1 and 8 in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K), valuation of shares-based compensation (Note 14 in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K) and interest rate and energy swap valuations (Notes 1 and 18 in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K). The Company believes that these key accounting policies and accounting estimates either do not generally require us to make estimates and judgments that are as difficult or as subjective as its critical accounting policies, or it is less likely that they would have a material impact on our reported results of operations for a given period.

For all financial statement periods presented, there have been no material modifications to the application of these critical accounting policies.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth as a percentage of revenues, certain items of the Company’s results of operations for each of the indicated periods.

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
         2011              2010              2011              2010      

Revenues

     100.0%          100.0%          100.0%          100.0%    

Cost of sales

     66.7             75.6             69.8             78.4       
                                   

Gross profit

     33.3             24.4             30.2             21.6       

Selling, general and administrative expense

     10.8             10.9             9.6             10.5       

Research and development expense

     1.1             1.4             1.0             1.4       

(Proceeds/gains) losses resulting from Gulf of
Mexico oil spill disaster

     (59.2)            1.6             (26.0)            0.9       

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural
disaster, net – 2008 storms

     —               (0.3)            —           (0.3)      

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural
disaster, net – 2005 storms

     (1.8)            —               (0.8)            —        

Loss on disposal of assets

     1.1             0.3             0.3             0.3       
                                   

Operating income

     81.3             10.5             46.1             8.8       

Interest income

     —               —               —               —         

Interest expense

     (1.2)            (1.7)            (1.2)            (1.8)      

Other expense, net

     (0.1)            (0.3)            (0.1)            (0.3)      
                                   

Income before income taxes

     80.0             8.5             44.8             6.7       

Provision for income taxes

     28.2             3.0             16.1             2.3       
                                   

Net income

     51.8%          5.5%          28.7%          4.4%    
                                   

Interim Results for the Second Quarters ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010

Revenues .    Revenues increased $7.9 million, or 21.9%, from $36.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $44.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher sales prices of 47.5% for the Company’s fish oil and higher sales volumes of 30.3% for the Company’s fish meal, partially offset by decreased sales prices of 1.6% for the Company’s fish meal and decreased sales volumes of 44.6% for the Company’s fish oil. Considering fish meal, fish oil and fish solubles sales activities in total, the Company experienced a $2.9 million increase in revenues due to the increase in sales prices and a $1.3 million increase in revenue caused by increased sales volumes, when comparing the three months ended June 30, 2011 to the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in fish meal sales volumes in the second quarter of 2011 is primarily due to the timing of export sales. The increase in fish oil sales prices is due to increased export demand primarily from the aquaculture industry as well as a general increase in global commodity pricing for fats and oils. Additionally, Cyvex, acquired by the Company in December 2010, contributed $3.7 million of revenue to the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

Cost of sales .    Cost of sales, including depreciation and amortization, for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $29.5 million, a $2.1 million increase, or 7.6%, as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues was 66.7% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 75.6% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in cost of sales as a

 

26


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

percentage of revenue was primarily due to the increase in fish oil sales prices realized in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the second quarter of 2010. Cyvex’s cost of sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $2.2 million.

Gross profit .    Gross profit increased $5.9 million, or 66.2%, from $8.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 to $14.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 33.3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 24.4% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the increase in fish oil sales prices experienced in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the second quarter of 2010, as discussed above. Cyvex’s gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 42.4% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

Selling, general and administrative expenses .    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.8 million, or 20.5%, from $4.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 to $4.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily due to the addition of Cyvex’s related expenses of $0.7 million and increased employee compensation related costs including, but not limited to, stock option compensation expense.

Research and development expenses .    Research and development expenses were $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

(Proceeds/gains) losses resulting from Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster .     During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company received $26.2 million, net of fees and expenses, from the GCCF in connection with the final settlement of the Company’s claims related to the impacts of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred losses to its unallocated inventory cost pool of $0.6 million due to costs incurred that were not able to be allocated to production as a result of intermittent plant and fishing grounds closures.

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net—2008 storms.     For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized a gain of $0.1 million related to a grant from the State of Louisiana Hurricane Gustav and Ike Fisheries Recovery Program. No such amount was recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net—2005 storms.     For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized a gain of $0.8 million, net of fees and expenses, in connection with the final settlement of the Company’s claims against its prior insurance broker stemming from the hurricanes affecting the Company in 2005. No such amount was recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

Loss on disposal of assets .    The Company recorded a net loss on disposal of assets of $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily related to the disposal of two fishing vessels, partially offset by insurance proceeds related to the disposal of one of the vessels. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss on disposal of assets of $0.2 million relating to the disposal of miscellaneous plant assets in the ordinary course of business.

Operating income.     The Company’s operating income increased $32.2 million from $3.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 to $36.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. As a percentage of revenues, operating income increased from 10.5% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 to 81.3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Excluding the above mentioned GCCF final settlement of $26.2 million from operating income for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 would have resulted in $9.8 million of operating income or 22.1% as a percentage of revenues.

Interest income .    Interest income increased by $6,000 from $4,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $10,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the increased cash balance upon which interest is earned during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

Interest expense .    Interest expense was $0.5 million and $0.6 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in interest expense relates to a smaller interest rate swap adjustment for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

Other expense, net .    Other expense, net was $0.1 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

Provision for income taxes.     The Company recorded a $12.5 million provision for income taxes for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 representing an effective tax rate of 35.3% for income taxes compared to 35.9% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily a result the impact of certain nondeductible items and the increased level of expected book income. The Company believes that it is more probable than not that the recorded estimated deferred tax asset benefits and state operating loss carry-forwards will be realized except for the amount for which a valuation allowance has been provided. The statutory tax rate of 35% and 34% for U.S. federal taxes was in effect for the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

27


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

Interim Results for the Six Months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010

Revenues .    Revenues increased $32.1 million, or 46.8%, from $68.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $100.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher sales prices of 43.0% for the Company’s fish oil and higher sales volumes of 53.9% for the Company’s fish meal, partially offset by decreased sales prices of 0.2% for the Company’s fish meal and decreased sales volumes of 22.0% for the Company’s fish oil. Considering fish meal, fish oil and fish solubles sales activities in total, the Company experienced a $6.7 million increase in revenues due to the increase in sales prices and a $18.6 million increase in revenue caused by increased sales volumes, when comparing the six months ended June 30, 2011 to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in fish meal sales volumes in the first six months of 2011 is primarily due to the timing of export sales and inventory carried forward from the previous fishing season. The increase in fish oil sales prices in the first six months of 2011 is due to increased export demand primarily from the aquaculture industry as well as a general increase in commodity pricing for fats and oils. Additionally, Cyvex, acquired by the Company in December 2010, contributed $6.5 million and Omega Shipyard, Inc. added $0.3 million of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Cost of sales .    Cost of sales, including depreciation and amortization, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $70.2 million, a $16.5 million increase, or 30.7%, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues was 69.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 78.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the increase in fish oil sales prices realized in the first six months of 2011 as compared to the first six months of 2010. Cyvex’s cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $4.2 million and Omega Shipyard, Inc.’s was $0.2 million.

Gross profit .    Gross profit increased $15.6 million, or 105.1%, from $14.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $30.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 30.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 21.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the increase in fish oil sales prices experienced in the first six months of 2011 as compared to the first six months of 2010, as discussed above. Cyvex’s gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 35.6% for the first six months of 2011. Cyvex’s gross profit percentage was negatively impacted during the first six months of 2011 by the one time inventory write-up to fair value that was made in conjunction with Cyvex being acquired by the Company in December 2010.

Selling, general and administrative expenses .    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.4 million, or 33.2%, from $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily due to the addition of Cyvex’s related expenses of $1.4 million and increased employee compensation related costs including, but not limited to, stock option compensation expense of $0.7 million. In addition, the Company accrued a reserve during the six months ended June 30, 2011 of approximately $0.4 million relating to the Proposition 65 Matter. See Part II Other Information – Item 1 Legal Proceedings.

Research and development expenses .    Research and development expenses were $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

(Proceeds/gains) losses resulting from Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster .     During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company received $26.2 million, net of fees and expenses, from the GCCF in connection with the final settlement of the Company’s claims related to the impacts of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred losses to its unallocated inventory cost pool of $0.6 million due to costs incurred that were not able to be allocated to production as a result of intermittent plant and fishing grounds closures.

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net—2008 storms.     For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized a gain of $0.2 million related to a grant from the State of Louisiana Hurricane Gustav and Ike Fisheries Recovery Program. No such amount was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net—2005 storms.     For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized a gain of $0.8 million, net of fees and expenses, in connection with the final settlement of the Company’s claims against its prior insurance broker stemming from the hurricanes affecting the Company in 2005. No such amount was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Loss on disposal of assets.     The Company recorded a net loss on disposal of assets of $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily related to the disposal of two fishing vessels, partially offset by insurance proceeds related to the disposal of one of the vessels. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss on disposal of assets of $0.3 million relating to the decommissioning of two fishing vessels which were sold as scrap.

 

28


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

Operating income.     The Company’s operating income increased $40.3 million from $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $46.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. As a percentage of revenues, operating income increased from 8.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to 46.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Excluding the above mentioned GCCF final settlement of $26.2 million from operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 would have resulted in $20.2 million of operating income or 20.0% as a percentage of revenues.

Interest income .    Interest income increased by $22,000 from $6,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $28,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the increased cash balance upon which interest is earned during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Interest expense .    Interest expense decreased $0.2 million from $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was attributable to the reduction in interest expense related to interest rate swaps.

Other expense, net .    Other expense, net was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Provision for income taxes.     The Company recorded a $16.3 million provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2011 representing an effective tax rate of 36.0% for income taxes compared to 36.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The Company believes that it is more probable than not that the recorded estimated deferred tax asset benefits and state operating loss carry-forwards will be realized except for the amount for which a valuation allowance has been provided. The statutory tax rate of 35% and 34% for U.S. federal taxes was in effect for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Seasonal and Quarterly Results

The Company’s menhaden harvesting and processing business is seasonal in nature. The Company generally has higher sales during the menhaden harvesting season (which includes the second and third quarter of each year) due to increased product availability, but prices during the fishing season tend to be lower than during the off-season. Additionally, due to differences in gross profit margins for the Company’s various products, any variation in the mix of product sales between quarters may result in significant variations of total gross profit margins. As a result, the Company’s quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate in the future. In addition, from time to time the Company defers sales of inventory based on worldwide prices for competing products that affect prices for the Company’s products which may affect comparable period comparisons.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, the Company’s primary sources of liquidity and capital resources have been cash flows from operations, bank credit facilities and term loans from various lenders provided pursuant to the U.S. Maritime Administration’s Fisheries Finance Program (“FFP”), which is offered through National Marine Fisheries Services (“NMFS”) under Title XI of the Marine Act of 1936 (“Title XI”). These sources of cash flows have been used for operations, capital expenditures, payment of long-term debt, the acquisition of Cyvex, purchases of fish meal and fish oil and the purchase and retirement of shares of the Company’s common stock in 2006.

At June 30, 2011, the Company had an unrestricted cash balance of $47.3 million, an increase of $27.5 million from December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the sale of inventory, the final settlement of the Company’s claims relating to damages resulting from the Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster with the GCCF and proceeds from the exercise of stock options and was partially offset by spending related to the 2011 fishing season, capital spending, debt payments and final payments related to the acquisition of Cyvex. Omega Protein’s annual revenues and its resulting liquidity are highly dependent on annual fish catch, production yields, selling prices for its products and inventories available for sale. Omega Protein’s average selling prices for its products for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were 2% higher than its average selling prices for the year ended December 31, 2010. Additionally, Omega Protein experienced a 1.0% higher per unit cost of sales during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.

The aggregate amount of the Company’s outstanding indebtedness at June 30, 2011 was approximately $31.8 million compared to approximately $33.3 million at December 31, 2010. The Company has a moderately leveraged financial structure which could limit its financial flexibility. In particular, the Company will be required to use a portion of its cash flows to pay principal and interest on its debt, which will reduce the amount of money the Company has for operations, capital expenditures, expansion, acquisitions or general corporate or other business activities. In addition, the covenants contained in the Company’s debt agreements limit its ability to borrow money in the future for acquisitions, capital expenditures or to meet the Company’s operating expenses or other general

 

29


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

corporate obligations. See “Risk Factors - The Company has a moderate amount of indebtedness, which may adversely affect its ability to operate its business, remain in compliance with debt covenants and make payments on its debt” in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K.

The Company has or had contracted through energy swap derivatives or has stop losses for approximately 80%, 45% and 3% of its budgeted 2011, 2012 and 2013 energy use, respectively.

Source of Capital: Operations

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased from approximately $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $35.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in operating cash flow is primarily attributable to increased sales prices of 13% and increased sales volumes of 21% of the Company’s inventory and the $26.2 million in proceeds related to the final settlement with the GCCF for its claims for costs and damages incurred as a result of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster.

Source of Capital: Debt

Net financing activities provided cash of $3.0 million and $8.7 million during the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The six month period ended June 30, 2011 included $4.7 million in proceeds and tax effects received from stock options exercised partially offset by $1.7 million in debt and capital lease principal payments. The six month period ended June 30, 2010 included $10.0 million in proceeds from a Title XI term loan, $1.6 million in debt and capital lease principal payments and $0.4 million in proceeds and tax effects received from stock options exercised.

On December 1, 2005, pursuant to the Title XI program, the United States Department of Commerce Fisheries Finance Program (the “FFP”) approved a second financing application made by the Company in the amount of $16.4 million (the “Second Approval Letter”). In May 2006, the Company submitted a $6.3 million financing request under the Second Approval Letter. The Company closed on the $6.3 million FFP loan in the first quarter of 2007. In September 2009, the Company submitted a $10.0 million financing request under the remaining Second Approval Letter. The Company closed on the $10.0 million financing request on June 1, 2010. On June 20, 2011, the FFP approved a third financing application made by the Company in the amount of $10.0 million (the “Third Approval Letter”). To date, the Company has not submitted any financing requests under the Third Approval Letter. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had approximately $31.8 million of borrowings outstanding under Title XI and was in compliance with all of the covenants contained therein.

On October 21, 2009, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (“the Loan Agreement”) which replaced the Company’s prior senior credit facility. The Loan Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank provides the Company with a senior secured credit facility consisting of a 3-year revolving credit facility of up to $35 million, including a $7.5 million sub-limit for the issuance of standby letters of credit, and is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets except for those already pledged in connection with existing federal Fisheries Finance Program loans. The Loan Agreement replaced the Company’s prior senior credit facility, under which, just prior to closing, $11.4 million was outstanding under a term loan and $2.8 million was outstanding under letters of credit. In connection with the closing of the Loan Agreement, the Company repaid the term loan at closing and the letters of credit were transferred to Wells Fargo Bank.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the Loan Agreement and approximately $3.4 million in letters of credit issued primarily in support of worker’s compensation insurance programs. The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements other than normal operating leases and standby letters of credit.

The Loan Agreement bears interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin and requires the Company to comply with various affirmative and negative covenants affecting its business and operations including the following financial covenants:

 

   

The Company is required to maintain on a consolidated basis a ratio of Total Liabilities (as defined in the Loan Agreement) excluding the non-current portion of Subordinated Liabilities (as defined in the Loan Agreement) to Tangible Net Worth (as defined in the Loan Agreement) not exceeding 1.00 to 1.00.

 

   

The Company is required to maintain on a consolidated basis Tangible Net Worth equal to at least the sum of the following: (a) $130,000,000, plus (b) 50% of net income (if positive, with no deduction for losses) earned in each quarterly accounting period commencing after December 31, 2009, plus (c) 100% of the net proceeds from any Equity Interests (as defined in the Loan Agreement) issued after the date of the Loan Agreement, plus (d) 100% of any increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from the conversion of debt securities to equity interests after the closing date.

 

30


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

   

The Company is required to maintain on a consolidated basis an Asset Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) of at least 2.50 to 1.00.

 

   

The Company (a) may not incur on a consolidated basis a net loss before taxes and extraordinary items in any two consecutive quarterly accounting periods, commencing with the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010, and (b) may not incur on a consolidated basis a net loss before taxes and extraordinary items for any annual accounting period, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Loan Agreement and expects to be in compliance for the remainder of 2011. For a more detailed description of the Loan Agreement, see the Company’s report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 23, 2009.

Use of Capital: Operations

Net investing activities used cash of $10.9 million and $7.4 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company’s investing activities consist mainly of acquisition costs and capital expenditures for equipment purchases, replacements, vessel refurbishments, and fish oil refining processes. The Company made capital expenditures of approximately $9.1 million and $7.6 million, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company anticipates making an additional $12 to $16 million in capital expenditures during the remainder of 2011 primarily for the refurbishment of vessels and plant assets and for the repair of certain equipment. Investing activities for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 also includes $0.3 million in proceeds for the disposition of assets and $2.1 million of final closing payments related to the Cyvex acquisition which took place in December 2010. Investing activities for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 also includes the receipt of a grant of $0.1 million from the State of Louisiana related to the impacts of 2008 Hurricanes Gustav and Ike.

Use of Capital: Acquisitions

The Company from time to time considers potential transactions including, but not limited to, enhancement of physical facilities to improve production capabilities and the acquisition of other businesses. Certain of the potential transactions reviewed by the Company would, if completed, result in its entering new lines of business (generally including certain businesses to which the Company sells its products such as pet food manufacturers, aquaculture feed manufacturers, fertilizer companies and organic foods manufacturers and distributors), although historically, reviewed opportunities have been generally related in some manner to the Company’s existing operations or which would have added new protein products to the Company’s product lines. Depending on the size of the acquisition, the Company would expect to finance the transaction using internally generated cash flows and its current credit agreements, or, if necessary, equity or debt financings. The Company cannot assure that such financings will be available on acceptable terms, if at all.

On December 16, 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding common stock of Cyvex in a cash transaction pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement with the founder and sole shareholder of Cyvex. Cyvex now is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Use of Capital: Contractual Obligations

The following tables aggregate information about the Company’s contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments (in thousands) as of June 30, 2011:

 

     Payments Due by Period  

Contractual Cash Obligations        

   Total      Less than
1 year
     1 to 3
years
     4 to 5
years
     After 5
years
 

Long-term debt

     $ 31,820             $ 2,997             $ 6,126             $ 5,607             $ 17,090       

Capital lease obligation

     1,018             476             542             —               —         

Interest on long-term debt and capital
lease obligation

     11,570             2,053             3,336             2,522             3,659       

Operating lease obligations

     6,970             2,066             3,838             982             84       

Pension Funding

     11,556             2,231             4,232             3,233             1,860       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Contractual Cash Obligations

     $     62,934             $     9,823             $     18,074             $     12,344             $     22,693       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

31


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

The Company believes that the existing cash, cash equivalents, cash flow from operations and funds available through the Loan Agreement and/or Title XI indebtedness described above will be sufficient to meet its working capital and capital expenditure requirements through 2011.

There have been no significant changes to the Company’s contractual cash obligations during the quarterly period ending June 30, 2011.

Available Information

The Company files annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the SEC. The Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), as well as Section 16 filings by officers and directors, are available free of charge at the Company’s website at www.omegaproteininc.com or at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and are posted as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with the SEC. The Company will provide a copy of these documents to stockholders upon request. Information on the Company’s website or any other website is not incorporated by reference into this report and does not constitute part of this report.

In addition, the public may read and copy any materials filed by the Company with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals, as well as the Charters for the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Scientific Committee, are available at the Company’s website. These Guidelines, Codes and Charters are not incorporated by reference into this report and do not constitute part of this report. The Company will provide a copy of these documents to stockholders upon request.

Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk associated with natural gas, diesel and Bunker C fuel prices. To partially mitigate this risk, the Company has forward purchased a portion of its expected natural gas, diesel and Bunker C usage for 2011, 2012 and 2013. The Company is currently exposed to market risk associated with increases in natural gas, diesel and Bunker C prices related to the portion not covered by swaps for 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Although the Company sells products in foreign countries, all of the Company’s revenues are billed and paid for in US dollars. As a result, management does not believe that the Company is exposed to any significant foreign country currency exchange risk, and the Company does not utilize market risk sensitive instruments to manage its exposure to this risk.

There have been no significant changes to the Company’s exposure to market risk since the Company’s most recent Form 10-K.

Item 4.   Controls and Procedures.

 

  (a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its “disclosure controls and procedures,” as that phrase is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”).

Based on and as of the date of that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO have concluded that (i) the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

 

32


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Company’s periodic reports. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.

 

  (b)

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings

The Company is defending various claims and litigation arising from operations which arise in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. In the opinion of management, any losses resulting from these matters will not have a material adverse affect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

On August 31, 2007, the Company filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Harris, Texas 295th Judicial District, against its prior insurance broker, Aon Risk Services of Texas, who procured the Company’s property insurance policies for the 2005/2006 policy year, which were the subject of prior litigation as a result of claims relating to Hurricanes Rita and Katrina. In June 2011, all outstanding claims related to the lawsuit were settled and the Company recorded $0.8 million, net of fees and expenses, as “Other proceeds/gains resulting from natural disaster, net – 2005 storms” in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. As a part of the final settlement, the Company released and waived all claims against Aon for all matters addressed in the litigation.

In March 2010, the Company was named as one of the defendants in a lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, by Chris Manthey, Benson Chiles and Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation (the “Proposition 65 Matter”). The other defendants in the lawsuit are CVS Pharmacy, Inc., General Nutrition Corporation, New Health Group, Inc., Pharmavite LLC, Rite Aid Corporation, Solgar, Inc., and Twinlab Corporation. The plaintiffs allege that fish oil dietary supplements produced by the defendants do not have adequate warnings regarding possible exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as required by Proposition 65 under California law, and request that the court grant injunctive relief and award monetary civil penalties. The Company’s total fish oil supplement sales in the State of California since inception have been approximately $6,200. The Company believes that its products comply fully with federal law promulgated by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration, standards of the European Commission and state law, including California, and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The Company does not believe that the resolution of this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had a $0.2 million accrual related to this matter.

In April 2010, the Company received a request for information pursuant to Section 308 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) from Region 3 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) concerning the Company’s wastewater practices for its fishing operations at its Reedville, Virginia facility. The Company has responded to the request. The Company believes it has been in compliance with all applicable laws with regard to wastewater practices. The Company cannot predict the outcome of the EPA’s review.

In February 2011, the United States Coast Guard conducted an inspection of the vessels at the Company’s Reedville, Virginia facility regarding the Company’s vessel bilge water disposal practices. Based on the results of this inspection and subsequent correspondence and discussions with the Coast Guard, the Company has conducted a full survey of its Reedville, Virginia fishing fleet to determine compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The survey has been submitted to the Coast Guard. Based on the Company’s findings and discussions with the Coast Guard, two of the Company’s Reedville based fishing vessels were temporarily delayed from fishing at the early May 2011 commencement of the Atlantic fishing season. Both of these vessels returned to full operations after the beginning of the fishing season. Although the Company does not expect such delay to materially impact its Atlantic fishing operations, the Company cannot predict the outcome of the Coast Guard review. The Company anticipates spending approximately $3.0 million to make the necessary improvements and repairs to all of its Reedville vessels.

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 except as follows.

 

33


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

In connection with its $44.8 million settlement with BP and the other Deepwater Horizon defendants, Omega Protein has waived any future potential claims against these defendants for any future damages that might manifest themselves from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill . These potential claims could include: (1) the effect of the oil spill on the Company’s business operations and fish-catch, both short-term and long-term, (2) the effect of government intervention in connection with the oil spill, including without limitation, any restrictions that may be imposed on fishing, navigation and access to the Company’s facilities or restrictions on the sale of marine proteins produced from the Gulf of Mexico, (3) the effect of the oil spill, short-term and long-term, on the menhaden fishery or ecosystem supporting that fishery, and (4) customer perceptions about marine products from the Gulf of Mexico or the United States due to concerns about contamination or availability. In the event that one of these potential claims manifests itself and has a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial results and results of operations, the Company would have no further right of recovery.

A finding by the ASMFC that overfishing occurred in the Atlantic menhaden fishery in 2008 may result in additional restrictions on Omega Protein’s menhaden harvest, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. The Atlantic State Marine Fisheries Commission (“ASMFC”) manages the menhaden fishery throughout the stock’s Atlantic coast-wide range. The most recent stock assessment for the Atlantic menhaden was completed in 2010 using data collected through 2008. According to federal and ASMFC technical experts, the assessment found that the Atlantic menhaden stock had undergone slight overfishing in one year, 2008; however, the population is not considered overfished, meaning that the stock abundance remains at or near target levels, above levels of concern, and can produce enough eggs to replace itself. The report indicates that the population was subject to slight overfishing in 2008 by an estimated four-tenths of one percent. More specifically, multiple runs of the stock assessment model revealed that there was a 53% probability that overfishing had occurred and a 47% probability that overfishing had not occurred.

In March 2011, the ASMFC initiated a review regulatory process which if enacted would: (1) require annual updates on menhaden recruits, or the numbers of fish in their first year of life, currently reviewed only every three years; (2) begin a process of developing management reference points for identifying the relative status of the stock using broad ecosystem indicators; and (3) establish interim management targets and consider regulatory tools to assist managers in achieving these targets. The interim management reference point target will be based on achieving 15% of the spawning potential the Atlantic menhaden stock would have if such stock were unfished. By comparison, in 2008, the estimate of this so-called “spawning potential ratio” was estimated to be 9%; however, those numbers have not been estimated for 2009 and 2010. The Company expects that such reassessment will not occur until the next stock assessment in 2012. These percentages do not necessarily translate into a corresponding percentage or proportionate reduction in the Company’s Atlantic fish catch due to other factors which have yet to be determined such as the period of time under review, projections of stock size in years since 2008, prevailing environmental conditions, recruitment success and other factors that have not yet been determined by the ASMFC.

The Company is unable to predict whether any management measures might be necessary for the 2012 fishing season or beyond. The earliest an ASMFC rulemaking process could be initiated is August 2011, so the Company does not expect any new constraints placed upon the fishery in 2011. Potential measures could include quotas, limitations on the number of days fished annually, a shortened season, no action, or other measures.

It is possible that this process could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial results and results of operations.

Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.   Removed and Reserved

Item 5.   Other Information

 

34


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

In April 2011, the Company entered into a new union agreement with a three year term with an affiliate of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union. The union agreement covers approximately 150 vessel employees at the Company’s Reedville Virginia facility.

Item 6.   Exhibits

 

Exhibit No.

  

Description of Exhibit

  31.1    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Executive Officer.
  31.2    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Financial Officer.
  32.1    Section 1350 Certification for Chief Executive Officer.
  32.2    Section 1350 Certification for Chief Financial Officer.

 

35


Table of Contents

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION

                         (Registrant)

 

August 3, 2011

     By:       /s/ Bret D. Scholtes
       (Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer)

 

36

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph L. von Rosenberg III, certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Omega Protein Corporation;

 

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 3, 2011

    By:  

/s/ Joseph L. von Rosenberg

      Name:   Joseph L. von Rosenberg III
      Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Bret D. Scholtes, certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Omega Protein Corporation;

 

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 3, 2011

    By:  

/s/ Bret D. Scholtes

      Name:   Bret D. Scholtes
      Title:   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2011, pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Omega Protein Corporation, certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

 

the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Omega Protein Corporation.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a part of the Form 10-Q.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Omega Protein Corporation and will be retained by Omega Protein Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: August 3, 2011

 

/s/    JOSEPH L. VON ROSENBERG, III        

Joseph L. von Rosenberg, III
President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2011, pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Omega Protein Corporation, certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

 

the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Omega Protein Corporation.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a part of the Form 10-Q.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Omega Protein Corporation and will be retained by Omega Protein Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: August 3, 2011

 

/s/    BRET D. SCHOLTES        

Bret D. Scholtes

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer